dos. William Camden, Historie . (London area, 1630), III, pp. 61-62; Jerome Age. Brooks, Tobacco: its Background Portrayed . throughout the Library out-of George Arents (5 vols., New york, 1937-52), I, pp. 46-49; II, pp. 156-158; Roentgen. N. Salaman, The historical past and you will Societal Dictate of your own Potato (Cambridge, 1949), pp. 83-96; Quinn, Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 344-348.
BIGGES, WALTER. A Summarie and you can Correct Commentary of Sir Frances [sic] Drakes Western Indian Trip. (First line from title and a few headlines cut.) Which have woodcut printer’s draw from Richard Occupation for the label. 4 will leave, https://datingranking.net/cs/three-day-rule-recenze/ 37 (1) pp., step one empty leaf. Small quarto. Morocco.
The following ENGLISH Edition, composed a comparable 12 months since basic. The current Roger Ward model appears to be shorter notorious compared to Richard Field edition (STC 3056) which preceded they an identical season–see the past amount. STC-Bishop-Ramage to find simply cuatro copies of Ward version just like the up against 11 of Career. The present backup gets the leaf before the title, empty except for brand new trademark-mark “An excellent,” and also the blank leaf towards the bottom.
F.” are taken to ocean toward February 4, 1589, for the purpose of reconnoitering the fresh Iberian shores when preparing having the fresh Drake-Norris expedition off 1589
STC 3057; Sabin 20841; Chapel 136 (note); Seas (ed.), Genuine and Perfecte Newes . Syr Frauncis Drake , pp. 53-70; Quinn, ed., The newest Roanoke Voyages , We, pp. 32-thirty five.
“T. He brings development of fate of your Invincible Armada of the last season: “So when regarding the past Fleete, [a great marchant from Lisbone] sayth, compared to most of the boats and you may carvels of your Language Fleete you’ll find get home however, nine and you may thirtie. but the majority of the many males you to definitely came home passed away immediatly during the the obtaining. As well as the Duke away from Medina was banished this new Legal for good.” Which second detail is pretty not true–King Philip did not blame brand new Duke for the failure from the fresh Armada promotion. The guy in addition to gives ins and outs of an effective naval step from Lisbon inside and that a great Greek motorboat full of drink off Crete is actually grabbed, and you may forecasts high profits on future assault.
(WINGFIELD, ANTHONY). A real Coppie away from a discourse published by a gentleman, involved in the fresh new late Trip from Spaine and you can Portingale. 2 makes, 58 pp., step 1 blank leaf. (Pp. 27-31 without having, supplied inside photostat.) Woodcut vignette with the name. Quick quarto. Old forums, fabric back.
Earliest Version, Very first Matter. Wingfield’s narrative is considered the most in depth membership extant of the 1589 attack towards the Spain demanded by the Sir Francis Drake and you may Sir John Norreys (Norris), and that sailed regarding Plymouth into the April 17, 1589, and you will came back later within the June. But not, an enthusiastic unnumbered afterwards number brings Wingfield because the publisher. 1
The fresh new trip unsuccessful within its principal goal, new elevating from a rebellion during the Portugal facing King Philip II from Spain, plus the enthroning out-of Dom Antonio, the very last men offshoot of your Aviz dynasty, from inside the Philip’s set. It did a certain amount of damage to Spanish naval shipment from the Corunna, in addition to certain marks of your Armada of the past seasons; and over sixty boats loaded with corn and you may naval offers which the brand new English considered contraband was basically pulled close Lisbon regarding the Hanse.
On the STC the publication is actually improperly ascribed in order to King Elizabeth’s favourite, Robert Devereux, Earl regarding Essex, whom took part in the fresh new expedition–far resistant to the Queen’s often–since the a volunteer
Two issues of this work are extant; signature E (pp. 25-32), which relates events of the attack upon Lisbon, in some copies (including this one) contains a passage in praise of the Earl of Essex on p. 26 (E 1 verso). As Queen Elizabeth was highly displeased with the Earl’s running off on this voyage against her orders, it is perhaps likely that the issue with the passage is the earlier of the two.
Leave a Reply